Comments on: Percentages vs Numbers. https://eliteedgemoney.com/percentages-vs-numbers-money/ Money | Minimalism | Mohawks Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:02:59 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: J. Money https://eliteedgemoney.com/percentages-vs-numbers-money/#comment-130616 Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:02:59 +0000 https://staging.eliteedgemoney.com/?p=35598#comment-130616 In reply to Josh.

Thanks man, have a blessed holiday over there, okay?

]]>
By: Josh https://eliteedgemoney.com/percentages-vs-numbers-money/#comment-130518 Mon, 09 Dec 2013 03:03:01 +0000 https://staging.eliteedgemoney.com/?p=35598#comment-130518 Hahaha! I laughed pretty hard at your first comment about how my argument made your appreciate the cold hard numbers even more. You’re totally right. At the end of the day, it just simply comes down to whatever floats your boat. And indeed, analyzing both the numbers and the percentages does give the most robust picture of what’s going on.

Thanks for keeping up a great personal finance blog! I always enjoy seeing what J$ is up to.

]]>
By: J. Money https://eliteedgemoney.com/percentages-vs-numbers-money/#comment-130490 Sun, 08 Dec 2013 02:05:04 +0000 https://staging.eliteedgemoney.com/?p=35598#comment-130490 In reply to Josh.

Haha, you know what’s funny about your examples here? They all made me appreciate cold hard numbers even more ;) A 500% return or 4% cash back/etc are all sexy – I agree 100% (ya see what I did there?), but to me it just doesn’t feel *as* good as $125 or $36 or whatever the numbers are. It’s like when I find a penny on the ground one day, and the next a quarter. Percentage people would LOVE to see a 2500% difference! But to me, it’s still only 25 cents, haha… (now for manipulation reasons I’d TOTALLY go with %’s as they paint a more drastic picture, but for my own cold cash I’ll stick w/ the numbers…)

I guess at the end of the day we’re all drawn to one side or the other more for whatever reason. But having BOTH numbers and percentages makes it even *better*.

Thanks for stopping by, brotha. Really enjoyed reading this :)

]]>
By: Josh https://eliteedgemoney.com/percentages-vs-numbers-money/#comment-130463 Sat, 07 Dec 2013 08:41:28 +0000 https://staging.eliteedgemoney.com/?p=35598#comment-130463 I was thinking about current savings accounts rates these days, and this blog post of yours came to my mind. Percentages really help put things into perspective. I’ll give you a few examples from my own recent experiences.

Current savings accounts rates all over the nation are at anemic levels, usually 1% at best, and averaging a painfully measly .06% (according to CNN Money, Oct. 2013, http://money.cnn.com/2013/10/01/pf/savings-account-yields/). Through my cash back credit cards (yes, I pay them off in full every month) I’m earning ~4% on my spending (yes, my SPENDING)! That’s significantly better than anything I can get in a savings account right now.

Another example. I just recently signed up for Capital One’s Black Friday promotion, offering $75 for funding a savings account with $500 (or more of course), and $125 for opening a checking account and making 5 debit purchases within 45 days of opening. That $75 for $500 ends up being a 15% return on my investment! It’s rare these days to get that kind of return. And if I use my new debit card to make five $4-$6 purchases buying coffee at Starbucks (which I plan to do) I’ve just earned a HUGE return on my money. Let’s say I spend about $25 at Starbucks with my new debit card. That’s a 500% return on my investment when I get that $125 bonus!

Last example. As some people have noted in here, the stock market has done unusually well this year. In the long run, stocks will return 7%-8%. But this year, there have been months where my 403(b) has posted double digit returns, as high as 15%! Not too shabby at all!

I can definitely see the reason why people prefer the cold hard numbers. They prefer the “gut punch” of the loss, or the fantastic high of the gain. But to me, these mean little when not compared through the scrutinizing eye of percentages.

]]>
By: J. Money https://eliteedgemoney.com/percentages-vs-numbers-money/#comment-126090 Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:04:01 +0000 https://staging.eliteedgemoney.com/?p=35598#comment-126090 In reply to Marissa@Thirtysixmonths.

I’ll have to agree with your statement 1800% more than the one before it ;)

]]>
By: Crystal https://eliteedgemoney.com/percentages-vs-numbers-money/#comment-125973 Thu, 12 Sep 2013 20:13:41 +0000 https://staging.eliteedgemoney.com/?p=35598#comment-125973 I’m all about the cold, hard dollar amounts since I need the swift punch to the gut to keep myself motivated too. :-)

]]>
By: Marissa@Thirtysixmonths https://eliteedgemoney.com/percentages-vs-numbers-money/#comment-125938 Thu, 12 Sep 2013 01:36:39 +0000 https://staging.eliteedgemoney.com/?p=35598#comment-125938 Hard numbers! Straight up. Percentages can mean so many things and to a certain point can be misleading. Ever wonder why most marketing specialist use percentages? It can do wonders to make something look good or look bad to the advantage of the person using it. However I have to agree with some of the commenters that there are indeed instances that there’s a need for both to be able to come up with a better perspective and make decisions too.

]]>
By: J. Money https://eliteedgemoney.com/percentages-vs-numbers-money/#comment-125899 Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:03:37 +0000 https://staging.eliteedgemoney.com/?p=35598#comment-125899 In reply to Taynia | The Fiscal Flamingo.

Well luckily you can have your wish in most cases :)

]]>
By: J. Money https://eliteedgemoney.com/percentages-vs-numbers-money/#comment-125898 Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:03:06 +0000 https://staging.eliteedgemoney.com/?p=35598#comment-125898 In reply to Mark Ross.

Haha true. Who wants to do double the work? :)

]]>
By: J. Money https://eliteedgemoney.com/percentages-vs-numbers-money/#comment-125897 Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:02:10 +0000 https://staging.eliteedgemoney.com/?p=35598#comment-125897 In reply to slug | sunkcostsareirrelevant.com.

For sure. Context is very good so having both is ideal.

]]>